Comparing the Apollo Order Picker Lift to Other Leading Models

Comparing the Apollo Order Picker Lift to Other Leading Models

In fast-paced warehouse and distribution environments, order picker lifts play a crucial role in maximizing efficiency, accuracy, and worker safety. Whether you're stocking shelves, retrieving high-level inventory, or managing seasonal order surges, having the right equipment matters. Among the top contenders in the market, the Apollo Order Picker Lift has earned attention for its unique blend of performance, safety, and value.

But how does it stack up against other leading models?

Let’s break it down.

Key Features to Compare

When evaluating order picker lifts, most facilities consider the following criteria:

  • Lift Height & Load Capacity

  • Maneuverability & Turning Radius

  • Battery Life & Charging Time

  • Operator Safety Features

  • Ease of Use & Ergonomics

  • Maintenance Requirements

  • Technology & Smart Controls

We’ll compare the Apollo Order Picker Lift to other popular models from brands like Crown, Raymond, Toyota, and Yale.

1. Lift Height & Load Capacity

Model Max Lift Height Load Capacity
Apollo 240 inches (20 ft) 1,000–1,500 lbs
Crown WAV 60 17 ft 750 lbs
Raymond 5500 240 inches 1,500 lbs
Toyota 6-Series 240 inches 1,500 lbs
Yale MMR 210 inches 1,200 lbs

Verdict: The Apollo competes directly with high-capacity models like Raymond and Toyota, outperforming compact options like Crown’s WAV in lift height and load.

2. Maneuverability & Turning Radius

Apollo is designed with tight aisle navigation in mind, offering:

  • Zero-turn radius options

  • Intuitive steering controls

  • Compact frame ideal for high-density storage environments

Crown’s WAV is highly maneuverable but limited in reach and load. Toyota and Raymond offer advanced steering but require wider aisle clearance.

Verdict: For tight warehouse layouts, Apollo provides the right balance of reach and agility.

3. Battery Performance

Apollo offers:

  • Long-lasting lithium-ion battery options

  • Fast charging (less than 4 hours)

  • Onboard battery monitoring system

Raymond and Toyota also feature strong battery technology, but some still rely on traditional lead-acid configurations, which have longer charging cycles and shorter life spans.

Verdict: Apollo’s lithium option and smart charging edge out traditional systems in uptime and efficiency.

4. Operator Safety & Ergonomics

All leading brands, including Apollo, incorporate key safety features like:

  • Anti-slip platforms

  • Guardrails and harness points

  • Emergency stop buttons

  • Speed regulation at height

Apollo goes further with:

  • 360-degree visibility

  • Integrated camera/monitor options (optional)

  • Ergonomic control layout to reduce operator fatigue

Verdict: Apollo meets or exceeds industry safety standards, with additional comfort features not always included in base models of competitors.

5. Technology & Controls

Apollo includes:

  • Digital diagnostics display

  • Access control (PIN or badge)

  • Smart sensors for height/speed regulation

  • Optional IoT connectivity for fleet monitoring

Crown and Raymond offer comparable tech, but often as add-ons or in premium models.

Verdict: Apollo’s tech-forward design gives it a modern edge, particularly for data-driven warehouses.

6. Maintenance & Support

Apollo lifts are built with modular components for easy part replacement, and the company provides responsive U.S.-based support. Maintenance is simplified with fewer wear points and easy-access panels.

Toyota and Raymond have larger support networks, but service can be slower and costlier for proprietary parts.

Verdict: Apollo’s ease of maintenance and strong support make it a smart long-term investment.

Final Thoughts: Is Apollo the Right Fit?

The Apollo Order Picker Lift holds its own—and often outperforms—established brands in key areas like height, safety, battery efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. It’s especially well-suited for:

  • Small to mid-size warehouses looking to upgrade from outdated or manual systems

  • Facilities needing reliable performance without paying a premium for branding

  • Operations emphasizing safety, tech integration, and ergonomic design

Leave a comment